Machine learning approaches for the prediction of lameness in dairy cows.

Lameness is one of the costliest health problems, as well as a welfare concern in dairy cows. However, it is difficult to detect cows with possible lameness, or the ones that are at risk of becoming lame e.g. in the next week or so. In this study, we investigated the ability of three machine learning algorithms, Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), to predict cases of lameness using milk production and conformation traits. The performance of these algorithms was compared with logistic regression (LR) as the gold standard approach for binary classification. We had a total of 2 535 lameness scores (2 248 sound and 287 unsound) and 29 predictor features from nine dairy herds in Australia to predict lameness incidence. Training was done on 80% of the data within each herd with the remainder used as validation set. Our results indicated that in terms of area under curve of receiver operating characteristics, there were negligible differences between LR (0.67) and NB (0.66) while MLP (0.62) and RF (0.61) underperformed compared to the other two methods. However, the F1-score in NB (27%) outperformed LR (1%), suggesting that NB could potentially be a more reliable method for the prediction of lameness in practice, given enough relevant data are available for proper training, which was a limitation in this study. Considering the small size of our dataset, lack of information about environmental conditions prior to the incidence of lameness, management practices, short time gap between production records and lameness scoring, and farm information, this study proved the concept of using machine learning predictive models to predict the incidence of lameness a priori to its occurrence and thus may become a valuable decision support system for better lameness management in precision dairy farming.

Increased serum potassium affects renal outcomes: a post hoc analysis of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the effect of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on serum potassium and the effect of a serum potassium change on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis in patients with type 2 diabetes participating in the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study. Renal outcomes were defined as a composite of doubling of serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease. RESULTS: At month 6, 259 (38.4%) and 73 (10.8%) patients in the losartan group and 151 (22.8%) and 34 (5.1%) patients in the placebo group had serum potassium ≥5.0 mmol/l and ≥5.5 mmol/l, (p < 0.001), respectively. Losartan was an independent predictor for serum potassium ≥5.0 mmol/l at month 6 (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.0-3.9). Serum potassium at month 6 ≥ 5.0 mmol/l was in turn associated with increased risk for renal events (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.00-1.50), independent of other risk factors. Adjustment of the overall treatment effects for serum potassium augmented losartan's renoprotective effect from 21% (6-34%) to 35% (20-48%), suggesting that the renoprotective effects of losartan are offset by its effect on serum potassium. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In this study, we found that treatment with the ARB losartan is associated with a high risk of increased serum potassium levels, which is in turn associated with an increased risk of renal outcomes in patients with diabetes and nephropathy. Whether additional management of high serum potassium would further increase the renal protective properties of losartan is an important clinical question.

The effect of losartan on hemoglobin concentration and renal outcome in diabetic nephropathy of type 2 diabetes.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can decrease hemoglobin, causing anemia and this may be an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease progression. We studied the relationship between a decline in hemoglobin and outcome in 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease by a post hoc analysis of the RENAAL Study (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) with an average follow-up of 3.4 years. The relationship between baseline and year-1 hemoglobin and treatment on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and ESRD or death was evaluated using multivariate Cox models (covariates: baseline hemoglobin, proteinuria, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and year-1 hemoglobin). Compared with placebo, losartan treatment was associated with a significant decrease of hemoglobin, with the largest between-group difference at 1 year. After adjustment, there were significant relative risk reductions for losartan compared with placebo for ESRD and for ESRD or death regardless of the baseline hemoglobin even in those patients with a baseline hemoglobin below 120 g l(-1). Hence, the renoprotective properties of losartan were maintained despite a significant lowering of the hemoglobin concentration.

Renal risk and renoprotection among ethnic groups with type 2 diabetic nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of RENAAL.

Type 2 diabetes is becoming the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Prevalence of ESRD and the antihypertensive response to renin-angiotensin system intervention are suggested to vary among different ethnicities. The Reduction in Endpoints in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, which included different ethnic groups, demonstrated a renoprotective effect of losartan. A post hoc analysis from RENAAL was performed where we examined in each ethnic group the ESRD risk, identified independent predictors for ESRD, effect of degree of baseline albuminuria, effect of 6-month antiproteinuric response to therapy on ESRD, and renoprotective effect of losartan assessed by albuminuria reduction and ESRD. Baseline albuminuria was the strongest predictor for ESRD in every ethnic group. Albuminuria reduction was associated with reduced risk of ESRD while losartan reduced albuminuria in every ethnic group. When accounting for independent predictors of ESRD, losartan exhibited renoprotection in all ethnic groups. In this type 2 diabetic population with nephropathy, baseline albuminuria is the predominant risk parameter for ESRD; early antiproteinuric effect of losartan predicts long-term renoprotection; and losartan appears to be renoprotective in all ethnic groups. Since the RENAAL study was not powered to determine ethnic responses, these results underline the need for prospective trials where the aim is renal protection among different ethnic groups.

Adverse effects of left ventricular hypertrophy in the reduction of endpoints in NIDDM with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan (RENAAL) study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We explored the impact of baseline left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and losartan treatment on renal and cardiovascular (CV) events in 1,513 patients from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial, which studied the effects of losartan on the progression of renal disease and/or death in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LVH was assessed using ECG criteria (Cornell product and/or Sokolow-Lyon voltage). The risk of renal or CV events was determined by a proportional hazards model fit with treatment allocation and presence of LVH. Covariates at baseline included age, sex, systolic BP, mean arterial pressure, pulse, proteinuria, serum creatinine, albumin and haemoglobin. RESULTS: A total of 187 subjects (12%) had LVH at baseline. Treatment with losartan resulted in a significant decrease in the Cornell product (-6.2%) and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (-6.3%). LVH was shown to be significantly associated with the primary endpoint, which was a composite of doubling of serum creatinine (DSCR), endstage renal disease (ESRD) or death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.44, p=0.011), as well as with the composite renal endpoint of DSCR/ESRD (HR=1.42, p=0.031) and CV events (HR=1.68, p=0.001). Losartan treatment of patients with LVH decreased the CV as well as renal risk to a level similar to that of patients without LVH. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, LVH is associated with significantly increased risk of CV events and the progression of kidney disease. Importantly, in patients with LVH, losartan reduced the CV as well as the renal risk to a level similar to that seen in subjects without LVH.

Effects of aging and AT-1 receptor blockade on NO synthase expression and renal function in SHR.

In an earlier study, we found increased NO production and NO synthase (NOS) expression in renal and vascular tissues of prehypertensive and adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). This study was designed to determine the effects of aging and AT-1 receptor blockade (losartan 30 mg/kg/day beginning at 8 weeks of age) on NO system in this model. Compared to the Wistar Kyoto (WKY) control rats, untreated SHR showed severe hypertension, elevated urinary NO metabolite (NO(chi)) excretion, marked upregulations of renal and vascular eNOS and iNOS proteins, normal renal function and heart weight at 9 weeks of age. Hypertension control with either AT-1 receptor or calcium channel blockade (felodipine 5 mg/kg/day) mitigated upregulation of NOS isoforms in the young SHR. With advanced age (63 weeks), the untreated SHR showed increased proteinuria, renal insufficiency, cardiomegaly, reduced urinary NO(chi) excretion and depressed renal and vascular NOS protein expressions as compared to the corresponding WKY group. AT-1 receptor blockade prevented proteinuria, renal insufficiency, cardiomegaly, and renal and vascular NOS deficiency. Thus, in young SHR, hypertension results in compensatory upregulation of renal and vascular NOS, which can be attenuated by vigorous antihypertensive therapy. With advanced age, untreated SHR exhibit cardiomegaly, renal dysfunction and marked reductions of eNOS and iNOS compared with the aged WKY rats. Hypertension control with AT-1 receptor blockade initiated early in the course of the disease prevents target organ damage and preserves renal and vascular NOS.

The pharmacokinetics of enalapril in children and infants with hypertension.

Forty children with hypertension between the age of 2 months and 15 years received 0.07 to 0.14 mg/kg of enalapril as a single daily dose. Enalapril was administered orally as a novel extemporaneous suspension in children younger than 6 years of age and as tablets in older children. First-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics were estimated in children ages 1 to 24 months, 25 months to < 6 years, 6 to < 12 years, and 12 to < 16 years. Maximum serum concentrations for enalapril occurred approximately 1 hour after administration. Serum concentrations of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, peaked between 4 and 6 hours after the first dose and 3 and 4 hours after multiple doses. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), adjusted for body surface area, did not differ between age groups. Based on comparison of first-dose and steady-state AUCs, the accumulation of enalaprilat in children ranged from 1.13- to 1.45-fold. For children ages 2 to 15 years, mean urinary recovery of total enalaprilat ranged from 58.3% in children ages 6 to < 12 years to 71.4% in children ages 12 to < 16 years. Urinary recovery for children ages 2 to < 6 years was 66.8%. The mean percentage conversion of enalapril to enalaprilat ranged from 64.7% for children ages 1 to 24 months to 74.6% for children ages 6 to < 12 years. The median effective half-life for accumulation ranged from 14.6 hours in children ages 12 to < 16 years to 16.3 hours in children ages 6 to < 12 years. There were two serious adverse events, neither of which was attributed to enalapril or resulted in discontinuation of the study drug. The extemporaneous suspension used in this study was tolerated well. The pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat in hypertensive children ages 2 months to 15 years with normal renal function appears to be similar to that previously observed in healthy adults.

[Effect of losartan on renal and cardiovascular complications of patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy]. / Effekt af losartan på nyre- og kardiovaskulaere komplikationer hos patienter med type 2-diabetes og nefropati.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Interruption of the renin-angiotensin system slows the progression of renal disease in type 1 diabetic patients, but similar data are not available for type 2, the most common form of diabetes. We assessed the role of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One thousand five hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled in this randomised, placebo-controlled study of losartan (50 to 100 mg, once daily) or placebo, in addition to conventional antihypertensive treatment (calcium antagonists, diuretics, alpha- and beta-blockers, centrally acting agents) for a mean of 3.4 years. The primary outcome was the composite of doubling of baseline serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary end points included a composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, proteinuria, and the progression rate of renal disease. RESULTS: Baseline demographics in the two groups were similar. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients receiving losartan reached the primary end point, as compared with 359 on placebo (risk reduction = 16 per cent, p = 0.02). Losartan reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine (risk reduction = 25 per cent, p = 0.006) and end-stage renal disease (risk reduction = 28 per cent, p = 0.002), but had no effect on death. Benefits exceeded that attributable to changes in blood pressure. The composite of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was similar in the two groups, except hospitalisation for heart failure, which was reduced with losartan (risk reduction = 32 per cent, p = 0.005). Proteinuria declined by 35 per cent with losartan (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Losartan conferred significant renal benefits in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy and was generally well tolerated.

Proteinuria as a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce urine protein excretion and slow the progression of renal disease. The beneficial effect in slowing the progression of renal disease is greater in patients with higher urine protein excretion at the onset of treatment. We hypothesized that the greater beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on the progression of renal disease in patients with higher baseline levels of proteinuria is due to their greater antiproteinuric effect in these patients. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 1860 patients enrolled in 11 randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of antihypertensive regimens, including ACE inhibitors to regimens not including ACE inhibitors on the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the level of proteinuria at baseline and changes in urine protein excretion during follow-up. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the relationship between changes in urine protein excretion during follow-up and the effect of ACE inhibitors on the time to doubling of baseline serum creatinine values or onset of end-stage renal disease. RESULTS: Mean (median) baseline urine protein excretion was 1.8 (0.94) g/day. Patients with higher baseline urine protein excretion values had a greater reduction in proteinuria during the follow-up in association with treatment with ACE inhibitors and in association with lowering systolic and diastolic blood pressures (interaction P < 0.001 for all). A higher level of urine protein excretion during follow-up (baseline minus change) was associated with a greater risk of progression [relative risk 5.56 (3.87 to 7.98) for each 1.0 g/day higher protein excretion]. After controlling for the current level of urine protein excretion, the beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors remained significant [relative risk for ACE inhibitors vs. control was 0.66 (0.52 to 0.83)], but there was no significant interaction between the beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors and the baseline level of urine protein excretion. CONCLUSIONS: The antiproteinuric effects of ACE inhibitors and lowering blood pressure are greater in patients with a higher baseline urine protein excretion. The greater beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on renal disease progression in patients with higher baseline proteinuria can be explained by their greater antiproteinuric effects in these patients. The current level of urine protein excretion is a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. ACE inhibitors provide greater beneficial effect at all levels of current urine protein excretion.

Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Interruption of the renin-angiotensin system slows the progression of renal disease in patients with type 1 diabetes, but similar data are not available for patients with type 2, the most common form of diabetes. We assessed the role of the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. METHODS: A total of 1513 patients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind study comparing losartan (50 to 100 mg once daily) with placebo, both taken in addition to conventional antihypertensive treatment (calcium-channel antagonists, diuretics, alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, and centrally acting agents), for a mean of 3.4 years. The primary outcome was the composite of a doubling of the base-line serum creatinine concentration, end-stage renal disease, or death. Secondary end points included a composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes, proteinuria, and the rate of progression of renal disease. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients in the losartan group reached the primary end point, as compared with 359 in the placebo group (risk reduction, 16 percent; P=0.02). Losartan reduced the incidence of a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration (risk reduction, 25 percent; P=0.006) and end-stage renal disease (risk reduction, 28 percent; P=0.002) but had no effect on the rate of death. The benefit exceeded that attributable to changes in blood pressure. The composite of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes was similar in the two groups, although the rate of first hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with losartan (risk reduction, 32 percent; P=0.005). The level of proteinuria declined by 35 percent with losartan (P<0.001 for the comparison with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Losartan conferred significant renal benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, and it was generally well tolerated.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease. A meta-analysis of patient-level data.

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for treatment of nondiabetic renal disease. DATA SOURCES: 11 randomized, controlled trials comparing the efficacy of antihypertensive regimens including ACE inhibitors to the efficacy of regimens without ACE inhibitors in predominantly nondiabetic renal disease. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE database for English-language studies evaluating the effects of ACE inhibitors on renal disease in humans between May 1977 (when ACE inhibitors were approved for trials in humans) and September 1997. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on 1860 nondiabetic patients were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.2 years. Patients in the ACE inhibitor group had a greater mean decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (4.5 mm Hg [95% CI, 3.0 to 6.1 mm Hg]) and 2.3 mm Hg [CI, 1.4 to 3.2 mm Hg], respectively) and urinary protein excretion (0.46 g/d [CI, 0.33 to 0.59 g/d]). After adjustment for patient and study characteristics at baseline and changes in systolic blood pressure and urinary protein excretion during follow-up, relative risks in the ACE inhibitor group were 0.69 (CI, 0.51 to 0.94) for end-stage renal disease and 0.70 (CI, 0.55 to 0.88) for the combined outcome of doubling of the baseline serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease. Patients with greater urinary protein excretion at baseline benefited more from ACE inhibitor therapy (P = 0.03 and P = 0.001, respectively), but the data were inconclusive as to whether the benefit extended to patients with baseline urinary protein excretion less than 0.5 g/d. CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive regimens that include ACE inhibitors are more effective than regimens without ACE inhibitors in slowing the progression of nondiabetic renal disease. The beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors is mediated by factors in addition to decreasing blood pressure and urinary protein excretion and is greater in patients with proteinuria. Angiotensin-converting inhibitors are indicated for treatment of nondiabetic patients with chronic renal disease and proteinuria and, possibly, those without proteinuria.

Trends in persistent proteinuria in adult-onset diabetes: a population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates temporal trends in the prevalence and incidence of persistent proteinuria among people with adult-onset diabetes (age > or =40 years). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The complete community-based medical records of all Rochester, Minnesota, residents with a diagnosis of diabetes or diabetes-like condition from 1945 through 1989 were reviewed to determine whether they met National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria. All confirmed diabetes cases residing in Rochester on 1 January 1970 (n = 446), 1980 (n = 647), and/or 1990 (n = 940) were identified. The medical records of these prevalence cases were reviewed from the time of the first laboratory urinalysis value to the last visit, death, or 1 April 1992 (whichever came first) for evidence of persistent proteinuria (two consecutive urinalyses positive for protein, with no subsequent negative values). Similarly, the medical records of all 1970-1989 diabetes incidence cases (n = 1,252) were reviewed to investigate temporal changes in 1) the likelihood of having persistent proteinuria before the date NDDG criteria was met, i.e., baseline; 2) the risk of persistent proteinuria after baseline; and 3) the relative risk of mortality associated with persistent proteinuria. RESULTS: The proportion of diabetes prevalence cases with persistent proteinuria on or before the prevalence date declined from 20% in 1970 to 11% in 1980 and 8% in 1990. Among the 1970-1989 diabetes incidence cases, 77 (6%) had persistent proteinuria on or before baseline; the adjusted odds declined by 50% with each 10-year increase in baseline calendar year (P<0.001). Among individuals free of persistent proteinuria at baseline, 136 subsequently developed persistent proteinuria; the estimated 20-year cumulative incidence was 41% (95% CI 31-59); the adjusted risk did not differ as a function of baseline calendar year. Survival of individuals with persistent proteinuria relative to those without was reduced but did not differ by baseline calendar year. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of persistent proteinuria among people with adult-onset diabetes in Rochester, Minnesota, declined 60% between 1970 and 1990. The decline appears because of a decrease in the proportion of diabetes incidence cases with persistent proteinuria before baseline rather than secular declines in the risk of persistent proteinuria after baseline or secular increases in the risk of mortality associated with persistent proteinuria. Similarity over time in age and fasting glucose at baseline, and at prevalence dates, is evidence that earlier detection of diabetes is not the sole explanation for the decline.

Retinal neovascularization is prevented by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system.

Both angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor are angiogenic agents that have recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. In this study, retinal neovascularization was examined in a model of retinopathy of prematurity with the use of neonatal transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats, which overexpress renin in tissues, and Sprague-Dawley rats. Blockers of the renin-angiotensin system were administered during the neovascularization period. The ACE inhibitor lisinopril and the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan both increased retinal renin levels and prevented inner retinal blood vessel growth. Quantitative in situ hybridization revealed that the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its type 2 receptor in the inner retina and proliferating blood vessels were increased in rats with retinopathy of prematurity. Lisinopril reduced both retinal vascular endothelial growth factor and its type 2 receptor mRNA in retinopathy of prematurity rats, whereas losartan had no effect. It is predicted that agents that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system may play an important role as retinoprotective agents in various forms of proliferative retinopathy.

The losartan renal protection study--rationale, study design and baseline characteristics of RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan).

The RENAAL Study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the renal protective effects of losartan in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. The study has enrolled 1513 patients and is expected to continue for 3.5 years after the last patient has been entered. Eligible patients must have a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio of at least 300 mg/g and serum creatinine between 1.3 to 3.0 mg/dL. Eligible hypertensive or normotensive patients are randomised to receive either losartan or placebo, in addition to their existing antihypertensive therapy. Medications that block angiotensin production or action, are excluded. The primary endpoint is a composite of the time to first event of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death; secondary endpoints include cardiovascular events, progression of renal disease, and changes in proteinuria; tertiary endpoints include quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation, and amputations. Patients include Caucasians (48.6%), Blacks (15.2%), Asians (16.7%), and Hispanics (18.2%). Baseline urinary albumin:creatinine ratio and serum creatinine levels average 1867 mg/g and 1.9 mg/dL, respectively. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures are 153 and 82 mmHg, respectively. RENAAL will document whether blockade of the AII receptor with losartan produces clinical benefits in patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

Safety of losartan in hypertensive patients with thiazide-induced hyperuricemia.

BACKGROUND: Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, has been shown to decrease serum uric acid and to increase urinary excretion of uric acid. METHODS: To determine if this effect can increase the risk of acute urate nephropathy, 63 hypertensive patients with thiazide-induced asymptomatic hyperuricemia (serum uric acid 7.0 to 12.0 mg/dl) were randomized double-blind to losartan 50 mg every day (q.d.), losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 50 mg q.d., HCTZ 50 mg q.d., or placebo for three weeks. To potentiate the risk of crystal formation, patients received a 2 g/kg protein diet one day prior to each clinic visit on days 0 (baseline), 1, 7, and 21. RESULTS: Adverse events typically associated with acute urate nephropathy, for example, flank pain, hematuria, or increased blood urea nitrogen/creatinine, were not reported. Uric acid excretion and urine pH increased four and six hours after losartan on day 1 compared with day 0. Dihydrogen urate, the primary risk factor for crystal formation, decreased at four and six hours on day 1 compared with day 0 associated with the concurrent rise in urine pH. Day 7 and 21 changes, compared with day 0, in uric acid excretion rate, urine pH, and dihydrogen urate with losartan were comparable to day 1 results but were not statistically significant. Serum uric acid was significantly reduced after 21 days of therapy with losartan. CONCLUSION: Losartan decreased serum uric acid and increased uric acid excretion without increasing urinary dihydrogen urate, the primary risk factor for acute urate nephropathy, during 21 days of dosing in hypertensive patients with thiazide-induced hyperuricemia.

Familial occurrence of retinitis punctata albescens and congenital sensorineural deafness.

PURPOSE: To report the cotransmission of retinitis punctata albescens (RPA) and congenital sensorineural deafness. METHODS: Case reports of two siblings with nyctalopia and profound bilateral sensorineural deafness. RESULTS: The affected siblings, an 11-year-old female and a 7-year-old male, presented with decreased visual acuity and night blindness. In both eyes of both siblings, ophthalmoscopic evaluation disclosed numerous white spots at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium with macular sparing. The rod threshold dark adaptation and electroretinogram tracings were consistent with advanced rod-cone degeneration. CONCLUSION: Two affected members of a family were found to exhibit RPA and congenital sensorineural deafness. This pedigree supports the genetic cotransmission of the traits.

Efficacy and tolerability of losartan in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. Collaborative Group.

We evaluated the blood pressure-lowering activity, tolerability, and safety of losartan in 112 hypertensive (sitting diastolic blood pressure, 90 to 115 mm Hg) patients with chronic renal insufficiency including mild renal insufficiency (30 to 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2; n=51), moderate to severe renal insufficiency (10 to 29 mL/min per 1.73 m2; n=33), or hemodialysis (n=28). After a 3-week placebo period, once-daily losatan was administered for 12 weeks. The daily dose of 50 mg was increased to 100 mg after 4 weeks in patients whose sitting diastolic blood pressure remained > or = 90 mm Hg or was reduced by < 5 mm Hg. A second, non-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, antihypertensive drug was added after 8 weeks as needed. Twenty-four-hour creatinine clearance was determined and renal clearance studies of inulin and para-aminohippurate were done in a subset of 11 patients. Trough sitting blood pressures were reduced at the end of the first week in all groups. At weeks 4, 8, and 12, the reductions in systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure averaged -11.9/-8.7, -10.8/-9.4, and -14.7/-12.1 mm Hg in patients with mild renal insufficiency; -7.7/-6.3, -13.1/-11.8, and -14.1/-10.6 mm Hg, in moderate to severe renal insufficiency; -17.0/-12.7, -19.1/-14.4, and -22.7/-18.0 mm Hg in hemodialysis. Creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, and effective renal plasma flow were stable. Losartan was withdrawn in only 6 patients because ofa clinical or laboratory adverse experience. Hyperkalemia (> 6 mEq/L) requiring discontinuation of losartan occurred in only one (group 2) patient. We conclude that once-daily losartan, given as monotherapy at doses of 50 or 100 mg or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs, was effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease and that losartan regimens were well tolerated in all groups, including those on hemodialysis.

The long-term tolerability of enalapril in hypertensive patients with renal impairment.

There has been some concern raised regarding the safe use of ACE-inhibitors in patients with severe renal insufficiency, including the development of hyperkalaemia in these patients. Therefore, the objective of the current analysis was to evaluate the long-term safety of enalapril in patients with severe renal sufficiency and hypertension. Three protocols with similar randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled designs were selected for analysis. A total of 153 patients, enrolled at six sites, were treated for up to 3 years with enalapril; 164 patients served as controls. One protocol used a fixed dose (5 mg/day) of enalapril, while the other two protocols allowed open titration up to 40 mg/day. The primary comparison was between the enalapril and control populations. For the analysis, patients, by treatment, were grouped according to the degree of renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > or < 3 mg/dl) at baseline. The incidence of the most common, as well as important, clinical and laboratory adverse events for this patient population were summarized. In addition, trends in important laboratory adverse events and the incidence of first-dose events, cough and angioedema were evaluated. The incidence of clinical adverse events was similar for both treatment groups, regardless of the severity of renal insufficiency. Seven patients died, four in the control group and three in the enalapril treatment group; none was considered related to treatment. Enalapril appeared to be well-tolerated in this group of patients with severe renal impairment.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in nondiabetic progressive renal insufficiency: a controlled double-blind trial.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of renal disease in different animal models of nephropathy. We tested this treatment modality in 70 hypertensive patients with severe renal disease of various etiologies. We report a double-blind study of the effect of 5 mg enalapril once daily compared with placebo in patients with nondiabetic severe chronic renal impairment (plasma creatinine 2.8 to 6.8 mg/dL; mean creatinine clearance 15 mL/min/1.73 m2) followed for up to 2 years. Efficacy parameters were the slopes of 51Cr-EDTA clearance, reciprocal of plasma creatinine, creatinine clearance, and the effect on urinary protein excretion. Thirty-one patients completed 2 years of treatment (12 in the enalapril group and 19 in the placebo group). Two patients died from nonrenal causes (one patient each in the enalapril and placebo groups), 16 patients commenced dialysis (seven in the enalapril group and nine in the placebo group), and eight patients were discontinued due to adverse events (five in the enalapril group and three in the placebo group). Eleven patients were discontinued because they were noncompliant, uncooperative, or moved (nine in the enalapril group and two in the placebo group). Two enalapril-treated patients were dropped from the study due to protocol deviations. Importantly, the statistical approach in this study evaluated all patients, regardless of the duration of treatment. A mixed-effects linear model and intention to treat analysis, taking into account the number of observations per patient, indicated that enalapril significantly reduced the rate of deterioration of renal disease: glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.038), reciprocal of plasma creatinine (P = 0.017), or creatinine clearance (P = 0.031). The renal protective effects of enalapril were shown to be in addition to its antihypertensive effect when blood pressure was held constant. Proteinuria was reduced by enalapril (P = 0.007) and was slightly increased in the placebo-treated patients (P = 0.051). The difference between these two groups was highly significant (P = 0.002). In conclusion, enalapril retarded the progression of chronic renal failure, as assessed by changes in glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, and 1/plasma creatinine, and reduced proteinuria in patients with nondiabetic severe chronic renal insufficiency.

Effects of the specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan on urate homeostasis and intestinal urate transport.

Possible mechanisms for the hypouricemic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan were examined using rats with experimental chronic renal failure (CRF) and control animals. The results show that losartan has a uricosuric effect in rats with normal or decreased renal function. Renal clearance of urate was increased 3-fold in CRF rats and 2-fold in control rats after 7 days of intraperitoneal losartan administration. Although the results show that losartan and its metabolite EXP-3174 alter urate and Cl- transport across isolated short-circuited intestine, these agents do not promote urate secretion into the intestinal lumen. Unidirectional urate and Cl- fluxes were reduced across normal rat colon and unaltered in the small intestine in the presence of losartan. In CRF rat colon, net secretion of urate and Cl- was abolished after losartan addition at 10(-5) M. Transport across the small intestine of CRF rats did not change in the presence of a similar concentration of drug. Losartan treatment of CRF rats before the removal of colonic tissues reversed the basal net secretion of urate to net absorption. These results suggest that the changes in intestinal transport observed in the presence of losartan appear to be mediated via the angiotensin II receptor antagonistic action of this drug. Direct determination of the effects of angiotensin II on urate and Cl- transport across colonic tissues from control animals revealed a significant angiotensin II stimulation of urate secretion. These angiotensin II-induced alterations in transport were inhibitable by losartan.